Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ATA: 3 Remove Under Utilised Regulated Airspace

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ATA: 3 Remove Under Utilised Regulated Airspace

    [3]Access to Airspace:[/3]

    3 Remove Under Utilised Regulated Airspace

    Terminal and some en route airspace which is no longer used or which is under utilised should be returned to Class G but there is no incentive for an ANSP to initiate that process. FASVIG would coordinate a review and its organisations would raise airspace changes to resolve this. Full use would be made of the new alternative tools of RMZ or TMZ.

    LAA discussion here

  • #2
    ATA: 3 Remove Under Utilised Regulated Airspace

    Full use of rmz or tmz? To get our airspace back from those who misappropriated it in the first place? No gain there.

    Comment


    • #3
      ATA: 3 Remove Under Utilised Regulated Airspace

      Well FAZVIG Could do worse than to start with the Norwich airspace and the Stansted TMZs. In all the times I've flown through the ends of the Norwich airspace I've never seen a single commercial movement.

      Comment


      • #4
        ATA: 3 Remove Under Utilised Regulated Airspace

        The CAA have to conduct a Post Implementation Review (PIR) of new airspace. The Norwich PIR should be underway by now and their ability to manage the airspace, and their utilisation should form part of that review. We await the result.

        Comment

        Working...
        X